These Fabulous Forum pages are archived here courtesy of The Wolftrap

History



Your name (optional) :
e-mail (optional) :

James E. Crisp
HI 251, HI 365

DeTreville
HI 207


"A very boring woman. I think of her as the stereotype of a dean of a top security prison. She doesn't try to make the class fun and all she does is lecture on and on and on and on and on and on and on. Most of her tests are extremely hard, if you can't pay attention, and no one can. Her tests consist of about five pages of written material ALL done in class or you get a zero. She will make you do five summaries of articles in the book and a seven page research paper near the middle of the semester. Take my word for it and do not take her class!!!"

Fountain
HI233

Fall97 "Fountain is great!! He loves history and is a great lecturer. His 2 quizzes are only moderatky difficult if you've gone to class and taken notes. He does cover a lot of material, but it's fun. The 1 paper due seems difficult, but he grades it a lot easier than the quizzes. Half of the class made A's on the paper. Highly recomended!"

Dr. Nancy Gustke
HI 251, HI 252

Joe Hobbs
HI 252

"Wonderful professor! You learn a lot in his class, but not that much about history. His favorite lecure is "Shit happens, you will bury your parents and you are going to have to deal with it!" He is definately entertaining and very wise."

Dr. Khater
HI 270 Modern Middle East

"Truly enjoyed coming to class. He has a fantastic knowledge of the subject, and will work hard with the students so they will do well on exams and/or papers. He isn't easy, but he is fair. He is a fantastic professor"

Middleton
HI 251

"Lots of notes, but you will learn. Grades pretty fair. He is definately a professor that I liked."

Carolyn Pumphrey
HI 208


John Riddle
HI 321

Ronald H. Sack
HI 207,403,404

"He is a good teacher, plain and simple. A very energetic lecturer that shows real interest in the subject. One thing though, be prepared to take notes, he give tons of info. No papers, non-comp final. Take his class."

Gerald Surh
HI233

HI233, I took the class in Fall,1999. I give this teacher a 3 out of 4, my grade in the class was B.
"This guy's a decent teacher. We had to read part of 5 different books, and do summaries, oral presentations, etc. But now I think he only teaches it as a scholars class ..."

John David Smith
HI 251

"He's really enterntaining. His tests consist of 4 take home essays that you have to write, though. He doesn't take attendance, but since you have to take notes in class to get information you need for tests you have to go anyways. Great class lectures...NOT boring."

Dr. Pam Tyler
HI 252

"Extremely passionate about the material and makes it easy to learn with interesting lectures."

Dr. Johnson= really easy and good; very nice
Tyler= good lecturer; be sure to read though, tests may surprise you
Cadell= great guy, very reasonalbe on late papers, will have to struggle for an A though
Carlton= nice guy, strict on attendence and HW assignments
Hobbes= even better than Tyler
Bohnam= just plain awful unless your the type of person who really loves pre‚1945technology; don't take this class unless you have to; and if you have to take another instructor
.

.


The material on this site is not endorsed, sponsored, provided, or on behalf of North Carolina State University